Blog

Who Watches the Watchmen? AI Code Generation and the Limits of Code Review

May 19, 2026

Original version initially published on 12th March 2026 on the WebRTC.ventures blog as Who Watches the Watchmen? AI Code Generation and the Oversight Problem. This is a reviewed and cleaned version.

Some weeks ago I read an article that captured something many experienced developers have been feeling for some time: software development is changing rapidly in the age of generative AI, and not always in ways we fully understand.

One quote from the article especially resonated with me in particular:

An MIT professor called AI “a brand new credit card that lets us accumulate technical debt in ways we were never able to before”. That credit card now writes 41% of the code.

Whether the exact number is accurate or not (Stability AI Ex-CEO Emad Mostaque has been saying so since 2023… and he predicts that it will be 100% by end of the decade), the point is clear: a large and growing portion of modern codebases is now generated with the help of AI tools. This has undeniable benefits: developers can prototype faster, explore ideas quickly, and automate repetitive tasks that previously consumed valuable time.

But this acceleration also introduces a structural challenge: we are producing code faster than we can reasonably understand and validate it. Some years ago, AI systems started to be so much complex that we started to lose track to understand how they think, becoming increasingly opaque. And now that they are starting to write our code, we are in a situation where we start to don’t understand how our code works too, nor how well it does.

In many teams, the question is no longer whether AI-generated code should be used, but how we can maintain quality and reliability when the volume of generated code keeps increasing.

And increasingly, it raises a deeper question: we may start to need AI to review and explain the code generated by AI, but who watches the watchmen?

Read More

WebRTC bitrate is not what you think

April 28, 2026

DOI

Most WebRTC discussions about bitrate are wrong. Not because people don’t know the APIs, but because they don’t control the experiment.

So instead of asking:

“what bitrate should I use?”

I built something slightly different:

a reproducible WebRTC benchmark to measure how codecs behave under controlled conditions

This is what came out of it.

Read More

Mafalda SFU receives “Best Scalable Real-Time Media Platform 2026”

February 5, 2026

I’m happy to share that Mafalda SFU has been recognised as “Best Scalable Real-Time Media Platform 2026” at the Spanish Business Awards organised by EU Business News.

You can find the official listing at https://www.eubusinessnews.com/winners/mafalda-sfu/, and the announcement published on the project website.

It’s always nice when a side project receives some external recognition, especially one that started mostly as an experiment.

Read More

Deterministic Audio Fixtures for End-to-End Testing

January 16, 2026

Designing Robust Spectral Validation for Audio Pipelines

Testing audio systems is deceptively hard.

Unlike text or structured data, audio pipelines are often lossy, time-sensitive, and highly stateful. Codecs introduce quantization noise, transports introduce jitter, buffers may reorder or drop frames, and decoders may subtly alter timing or amplitude. Traditional byte-level comparisons or waveform diffs are therefore brittle and misleading.

In this article, I present audio-test-fixtures, a deterministic, spectral-based approach to testing audio pipelines end-to-end. The result is a small but robust toolkit that generates known audio fixtures and validates decoded output using FFT-based frequency analysis, designed to work reliably even with lossy codecs and imperfect transports.

Read More

Routing Android Device Through a Laptop Using Bluetooth PAN and Tailscale

November 25, 2025

A Practical Walkthrough of a Surprisingly Hard Problem

For a task that sounded trivial at first, this experiment turned into a surprisingly deep dive into Android networking limitations, routing constraints, VPN behavior, and how Bluetooth Personal Area Networking (PAN) actually works under the hood.

My goal sounded simple:

Connect an Android phone to my Linux laptop over Bluetooth PAN and route ALL traffic from the phone to the Internet through the laptop — without Wi-Fi, without mobile data, without USB tethering, and without root.

Easy peasy.

Read More

Adding Backpressure to Python’s ProcessPoolExecutor

October 1, 2025

Recently I’ve hit a practical limitation with Python’s ProcessPoolExecutor: when feeding it tens of thousands of tasks from hundreds of producer threads, the executor happily accepted them all. The result? Memory usage ballooned, latency increased, and eventually the whole system became unstable.

Read More

Bringing Class-Based Views to Fastify (Inspired by Django)

September 29, 2025

Why doesn’t Node.js have something like Django’s Class-Based Views (CBVs)?

I love Django key features like its class-based views or ORM, and I usually miss them when working with Node.js. So yesterday night, in the middle of my usual insomnia, I wondered if anyone had already built something like that for Node.js.

I did a quick search, and what I found were just a few experiments from ~8–9 years ago. Nothing robust, modern, or maintained.

Django Class-Based Views (CBVs) provide a clear structure, lots of built-in functionality, and still enough flexibility to adapt them to different use cases. So I decided to sketch out a design for Fastify (and Node.js in general) that feels natural to use, contract-first, and TypeScript-friendly. This post is a walk-through of that exploration during the rest of the Sunday.

Read More

How to build WebRTC for Android in Ubuntu 25.04

September 16, 2025

Google used to provide prebuild Android images of libWebRTC library, and in fact, it’s (still) the recomended way to use them on its own documentation. But starting on WebRTC M80 release (January 2020), they decided to deprecate the binary mobile libraries, and the reasons were that the builds were intended just only for development purposes, and users were already building it themselves with their own customizations, or using third party libraries that embedded them (where have been left developers that just want to build a WebRTC enabled mobile app?), and they just only provided another build in August 2020 (1.0.32006) to fill some important security holes, in case someone (everybody?) was still using the binary mobile libraries.

Read More